Sunday, June 24, 2007
Stormy Skies
Monday, May 07, 2007
DA 10-17mm Fisheye: Another great lens!
Pentax K10D with Pentax DA 10-17mm Fish-eye. Raw processed with Adobe ACR.
Very good at close-up too...
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Myth Busting: FA 43mm Limited
Well, I finally decided to bite the bullet and bought it (for the futile reason stated above). As soon as I reviewed the very first image I took with this lens, I had the feeling that this might be THE lens! The image was just so rich and sharp and the colors so thick and smooth. And the build, the size, the lens hood, the weight… everything is so perfect.
I decided to run some controlled tests against the FA 50mm f/1.4 and the DA 40mm f/2.8 and found that the FA 43mm is indeed sharper at f/1.9 than the excellent DA 40mm at f/2.8 and as sharp as the FA 50mm f/1.4 at f/2.0 (corner sharpness is better with FA 50mm, though).
Friday, March 09, 2007
Sunday, February 25, 2007
By popular demand: Pentax DA 70mm Limited compared to FA 77mm
Back in October 2006, I had the opportunity to try the newly introduced DA 70mm f/2.4 Limited "Pancake" lens along with the legendary FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited. I posted some sample images from both lenses in the Pentax SLR forum at DPreview.
The images were lost when I switched to another ISP. Upon request, I decided to repost them with the (edited) comments I wrote about these two fine lenses.
- The DA 70 is way smaller and lighter than the FA 77. It totally deserves the pancake appellation.
- The DA 70 is a tiny bit sharper wide open than the FA 77 at f/2.5.
- There is some purple fringing with the FA 77, none with the DA 70.
- AF is very fast and quiet with the DA 70, fast (but noisy) with the FA 77.
- The FOV difference between 70mm and 77mm is more important that I was expecting.
- Stopped at f/2.4, the FA 77 seems to expose about 1/3 stop faster than the DA 70 set to the same aperture and the DOF is narrower, which makes me think that the DA 70 is closer to f/2.8 than the claimed f/2.4 wide open.
- As for bokeh, I will let you judge. The topic is just too suggestive and too controversial.
Pictures were taken with K100D (raw), processed with Adobe ACR. No other adjustments then resizing for the web.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
K10D Adobe ACR 3.7 Calibration
Here are the values:
| Shadow Tint | -3 |
| Red Hue | -14 |
| Red Saturation | +22 |
| Green Hue | -6 |
| Green Saturation | +6 |
| Blue Hue | +13 |
| Blue Saturation | -5 |
I wouldn't recommend to use these values "as is" but as starting point if you can't do your own calibration (you need the Calibrator script and a GretagMacBeth Color Checker).
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Brazos Bend State Park
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Testing K10D and K100D Shake Reduction
Quick and dirty test to evaluate how SR performs with the K10D and K100D. Lots of people are asking me about SR performance and I wanted to provide a bit more than just my suggestive evaluation.
I used the Pentax DA 50-200mm for this test. For reference, I also added 3 shots from Nikon D200 with Nikkor AF-D 80-200mm f/2.8 (obviously, no SR).
All shots were hand held (duh!) and taken at 200mm ISO 400 f/8 and around 1/5s. Yes, it's over 5 stops below the minimum recommend shutter speed!
I took exactly and only 3 images with SR OFF followed by exactly and only 3 images with SR ON. I didn't discard any image.
In short: SR works great and has been improved in the K10D over that in the K100D, as claimed by Pentax.
My Olympus E-1 Gallery
